About three months ago, on the 4th December, 2013, the
government announced that children who were in foster care would be allowed and
supported to remain with their foster carers until they were 21 years of age. At the time, many caring people genuinely
felt this was a massive breakthrough in the fight for support for young people
leaving care that had been going on for many years. As we noted at the time, there was much celebration amongst campaigners
when the announcement was made.
Some of us did not celebrate unequivocally. We saw that this breakthrough was only
partial; it only offered enhanced support to one single group of care leavers
but not to others. Whereas a large
majority of children in care are in foster care, about 9% of children in care, about 6,000 children, are in
residential children’s homes and other settings. There was to be no enhanced provision or right
to stay put in their placements given to these children.
Strange and incongruous as it seemed to us, children in
residential care were to be excluded in this change even though arguably the
residential sector cares for possibly the most vulnerable and disadvantaged
young people who may be unable, or indeed choose not to be fostered. In the
celebrations this group were invisible.
We struggled with
this so checked carefully, but there was no obvious child care centred reason
based on good practice for this. How could this be? How could one vulnerable
group of children simply be left out? These children had the same needs and
presented the same challenges as children in foster care. Indeed, they were
often their siblings. They were at least
as vulnerable and faced the same disadvantages as their peers in foster
care. The shocking reality dawned on us that
the decision was not based on any other factor but where the child was placed
when they were due to leave care. This
was clearly blatant discrimination.
The campaign to gain equal aftercare support for young people in children’s
homes to that given to young people in foster care was born, and the “Every
Child Leaving Care Matters” petition was opened.
Today, that petition
has been signed by over 6000 people – one for every child placed in residential
care who would be and as it stands will be excluded from this
discriminatory government policy. We
know from our contacts with signatories that many are social workers and social
work teachers who are unhappy with being asked to discriminate between
vulnerable children based on placement rather than need. Some are psychologists who struggle with the
idea that support will be based on geography rather than assessment. Some are lawyers who see the injustice in the
policy the government are seeking to pursue.
Many are care leavers who have struggled leaving care and don’t want any
more children to have to struggle. Many
are care providers, and we are proud to include foster carers and adoptive
parents in our ranks who want equality for all children. The campaign’s aim for equal support for all
care leavers until they are at least 21 years old is now openly shared and
promoted by major child care charities as well.
We welcome all those
who put the needs of children and young people first. We are people from
all walks of life bound together only by our determination to see all children and
young people leaving care treated equally, treated without discrimination and
based on their needs and wishes. It just
seems obvious and basic to us.
The government has presented a range of reasons why they say
equal care cannot be given at this time.
We have responded to them in
our blogs in recent weeks. Please have a
look at our blog library and hopefully you will agree with us that the excuses
don’t hold water and can be addressed fairly easily with good will and
cooperation.
We have consistently
offered to meet with ministers to discuss how to amend their discriminatory
policy and give all care leavers equal opportunities and support until they are
21. They have declined to date. The offer remains open. For the sake of the
next generation of children and young people leaving care, I hope they accept
it this time.
No comments:
Post a Comment